Perbedaan Pertumbuhan Artemia salina Pada Perlakuan Variasi Dosis Pakan Jus Pupa Ulat Sutra (Samia cynthia) The Distinction in Growth of Artemia salina on the Doses Variations of Silkworm (Samia cynthia) Pupae Juice Feeding
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
High protein feed are very necessary in the cultivation industry of Artemia salina. One of the proteins sources that can be used is silk worm pupae (Samia cynthia). The aim of this study was to determine the differences in growth of Artemia salina with the treatment of silkworm pupa juice feeding at various doses. This study uses 4 levels of treatment, namely 0.16 ml; 0.33 ml; 0.50 ml and 0.67 ml per liter with 6 replications, which are given daily for 21 days. Abiotic factors of culture media (salinity, temperature, pH, and DO) are controlled and in accordance with the needs of Artemia salina's life. Observation results on the 15th day, 17th day, and 19th day showed that there were differences in the number of Artemia salina due to the treatment of variations in the feed dose of silkworm pupae juice (Samia cynthia) with 0.67 ml feed dosage treatment having the highest average number and significantly different from other dosage treatments. Observations on the 13th day, 15th day and 21st day showed differences in the growth length of Artemia salina due to the variation of the dosage treatment of silkworm pupa juice (Samia cynthia) with 0.50 ml dose treatment having the highest average length and significantly different from other treatments.
Keywords: Artemia salina, growth, feed, silkworm pupae
ABSTRAK
Pakan yang mengandung protein tinggi sangat diperlukan dalam budidaya Artemia salina. Salah satu sumber protein yang dapat digunakan adalah pupa ulat sutra (Samia cynthia). Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan pertumbuhan Artemia salina dengan perlakuan pemberian pakan jus pupa ulat sutra pada berbagai dosis. Penelitian ini menggunakan 4 taraf perlakuan yaitu dosis 0,16 ml; 0,33 ml; 0,50 ml dan 0,67 ml per liter dengan 6 ulangan, yang diberikan setiap hari selama 21 hari. Faktor abiotik media kultur (salinitas, suhu, pH, dan DO) terkontrol dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan hidup Artemia salina. Hasil pengamatan hari ke-15, hari ke-17, dan hari ke-19 menunjukkan adanya perbedaan jumlah Artemia salina akibat pemberian perlakuan variasi dosis pakan jus pupa ulat sutra (Samia chyntia) dengan perlakuan dosisi pakan 0,67 ml memiliki retata jumlah tertinggi dan berbeda nyata dengan perlakuan dosis lainnya. Hasil pengamatan pada hari ke-13, hari ke-15 dan hari ke-21 menunjukkan adanya perbedaan pertumbuhan panjang Artemia salina akibat pemberian perlakuan variasi dosis pakan jus pupa ulat sutra (Samia chyntia) dengan perlakuan dosis 0,50 ml memiliki rerata panjang tertinggi dan berbeda nyata dengan perlakuan yang lain.
Kata kunci: Artemia salina, pertumbuhan, pakan, pupa ulat sutra
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Attribution:
Jurnal Biosaintropis (Bioscience-Tropici s licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY). The work has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or part of a published lecture or thesis) and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. When the manuscript is accepted for publication in this journal, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
Permissions:
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere and by other authors are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from one of the authors.
Ethical matters:
Experiments with animals or involving human patients must have had prior approval from the appropriate ethics committee. A statement to this effect should be provided within the text at the appropriate place. Experiments involving plants or microorganisms taken from countries other than the authors™ own must have had the correct authorization for this exportation.
References
[2] Gerintya, S. 2017. Buletin Online Tirto: Benarkah Ekspor Perikanan Indonesia Kuat? Tanggal Akses 2 Juni 2018. URL: https://tirto.id.
[3] Laoli, N. 2020. Begini Cara KKP Kampanyekan Gemar Makan Ikan di Tengah Pandemi Corona. Tanggal Akses 13 Juli 2020. URL: https://industri.kontan.co.id/news/.
[4] Suherman, A. 2020. 2020, KKP Targetkan Konsumsi Ikan 56,39 kg. URL: https://kkp.go.id/artikel/.
[5] Kementerian Perikanan dan Kelautan (KKP). 2019. Optimalisasi Potensi Budidaya Ikan Hias Nasional. Tanggal Akses 13 Juli 2020. URL: https://kkp.go.id/djpb/artikel/.
[6] Noviandri, R. 2015. Tantangan untuk Perikanan Budidaya. Tanggal Akses 1 Februari 2018. URL: https://arsip.batampos.co.id.
[7] Bahari, M. C., Suprapto, D. dan Hutabarat, S. 2014. Pengaruh Suhu Dan Salinitas terhadap Penetasan Kista Artemia Salina Skala Laboratorium. Journal Management of Aquatic Resources (MAQUARES). 3(4), hal. 188-194.
URL: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/maquares/article/view/7098.
[8] Sukardi, P. dan Winanto. 2011. Pakan Alami: Manfaat, Jenis dan Metode Kultur. Penerbit UNSOED. Purwokerto.
[9] Herawati, V. E., Hutabarat, J. and Radjasa, O. K. 2014. Nutritional Content of Artemia sp. Fed with Chaetoceros calcitrans and Skeletonemacostatum. HAYATI J Biosci. 21(4), hal. 166-172. doi: 10.4308/hjb.21.4.166.
[10] Sorgeloos, P., Dhert, P. and Candrevan, P. 2001. The Use The Brine Shrimp Artemia in Marine Fish Larviculture. Aquac. 200, hal. 147-159.
[11] Saragih, S. 2016. Tekan Impor Rp. 56 Miliar, KKP Kembangkan Artemia di Tiga Daerah Percontohan. Tanggal Akses 18 Desember 2017. URL: https://industri.bisnis.com.
[12] Sorgeloos, P. 2001. The Use of The Brine Shrimp Artemia in Aquaculture. Ecology, Culturing, Use in Aquaculture. Vol 3. Universa Press. Belgium. Hal. 456.
[13] Soni, A. F. M. 2004. Pengembangan Teknologi Budidaya Artemia di Tambak Garam. Balai Besar Pengembangan Budidaya Air Payau. Jepara.
[14] Tomotake, H., Katagiri, M. and Yamato, M. 2010. Silkworm Pupae (Boomyx mori) are New Sources of High Quality Protein and Lipid. J Nutr Sci Vitam.56, hal. 446-448.
[15] Rao, P.U. 1994. Chemical composition and Nutritional Evaluation of Spent Silk Worm Pupae. J Agric Food Chem. 42(10), hal. 2201-2203.
URL: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jf00046a023.
[16] Amarouayache, M. and Kara, M. 2017. Aspects of Life History of Artemia Salina (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) from Algeria Reared in Different Conditions of Salinity. Marine Bioressources Laboratory, Marine Sciences Department, Faculty of Sciences, Annaba University Badji Mokhtar, Algeria.
[17] Riisgård, H.U., Zalacáin, D., Jeune, N., Wiersma, J.B., Lüskow, F. and Pleissner, D. 2015. Adaptation of The Brine Shrimp Artemia Salina (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) to Filter-Feeding: Effects of Body Size and Temperature on Filtration and Respiration Rates. J Crustacean Biol.35(5), hal. 650-658.
[18] Dhont, J. and Lavens, P. 1996. Manual on the Production and Use of Live Food for Aquaculture. Laboratory of Aquaculture and Artemia Reference Center University of Ghent. Belgium.
[19] Fogg, G. E. 1957. Relationships between Metabolism and Growth in Plankton. Department of Botany, University College London. MicrobioE. 16, hal. 294-297.
[20] Case, T. J. 2000. An Illustrated guide to theoretical ecology. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 477 pp.
[21] Stappen, G. V. 1996. Introduction, biology and ecology of Artemia. Manual on the Production and Use of Live Food for Aquaculture Laboratory of Aquaculture & Artemia Reference Center University of Gent, Belgium.
[22] Pena-Aguado, F., Nandini, S. and Sarma, S.S. 2005. Differences in Population Growth of Rotifer and Cladocerans Raised on Alga Diets Supplemented with Yeast. Limnologica. 35(4), hal. 298-303. Received March, 8th, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2005.08.002. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0075951105000642
[23] Odum, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. Third Edition. Saunders College Publishing. Philadelphia.
[24] Djunaedi, A. 2015. Pertumbuhan Artemia sp. dengan Pemberian Ransum Pakan Buatan Berbeda. Jurnal Kelautan Tropis. 18(3), hal.133–138. doi:10.14710/jkt.v18i3.525.
[25] Keister, J. E. and Bonnet, D. 2012. Zooplankton Population Connections, Community Dynamics, and Climate Variability. ICES J Mar Sci. 69(3), hal. 347–350. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fss034.
[26] Susanto, P. 2000. Ekologi Hewan. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta.
[27] Effendi, M.I. 2002. Biologi Perikanan. Yayasan Pustaka Nustama. Yogyakarta.
[28] Revindran, V. and Blair, R. 1993. Animal Protein Sources. World’s Poult Sci. 1993(49), hal. 219-235.
[29] Toonen, R. 2004. Aquarium Invertebrates: Nutritional Value of Live Foods for The Coral Reef Aquarium, Part 2. Tanggal Akses 2 Juni 2018. URL: https://reefs.com/magazine
[30] Suryanti, Y. 2004. Pengaruh Rasio Energi Dan Protein Yang Berbeda Terhadap Efisisensi Pemanfaatan Protein Pada Beninh Baung. Penelitian Perikanan Indonesia. 9(1), hal.31-36.