Analisis Faktor Determinan Vaginosis Bakterial secara Retrospektif di RSUD Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang Tahun 2012-2016 Determinant Analysis of Bacterial Vaginosis Retrospectively in “RSUD Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang†at 2012-216
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Most of the world's female population suffers from Bacterial Vaginitis characterized by changes in the normal vaginal flora replaced by anaerobic bacteria and facultative bacteria. Bacterial vaginitis increases the risk of STIs, abortion events, preterm labor, low birth weight, premature rupture of membranes and postpartum endometritis. It takes a retrospective study to determine the determinant factors that affect the population of Bacterial Vaginosis. The method this research using descriptive epidemiology and using retrospective approach, with observational research design. Secondary data were obtained from medical records of Obgyn Outpatient, with supporting data from Vulvovaginal Preparation Test. The place of research is done in the Medical Record Section. The population was all patients enrolled in the Obgyn of Outpatient Care Unit. The study sample was taken from patients diagnosed Bacterial Vaginitis in the period January 2012-December 2016. The results of the study, there were 50 cases of Bacterial Vaginitis. Determinant factors affecting Bacterial Vaginitis population in are age factor with range of 25-44 years (62%), patients with high school education status (16%), then patients with employment status as private workers and married status (88% ).
Keywords : Bacterial vaginitis, Determinant Factor, Retrospective
ABSTRAK
Sebagian besar populasi wanita di dunia menderita Vaginosis Bakterial yang ditandai dengan perubahan flora normal vagina diganti dengan bakteri anaerob dan bakteri fakultatif.Vaginosis Bakterial meningkatkan resiko infeksi menular seksual, kejadian abortus, persalinan prematur, berat bayi lahir rendah, ketuban pecah dini dan endometritis postpartum. Sehingga diperlukan penelitian retrospektif untuk mengetahui faktor determinan yang berpengaruh terhadap populasi Vaginosis Bakterial. Metode penelitian ini adalah epidemiologi deskriptif menggunakan pendekatan retrospektif, dengan desain penelitian observasional. Data sekunder diperoleh dari catatan rekam medik pasien Unit Rawat Jalan Obgyn, dengan data pendukung dari hasil Tes Vulvovaginal Preparat. Populasi ialah semua pasien yang terdaftar dalam Unit Rawat Jalan Poliklinik Obgyn. Sampelpenelitian diambil dari pasien yang didiagnosis Vaginosis Bakterial pada periode Januari 2012-Desember 2016. Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan kejadian vaginosis bakterial sebanyak 50 kasus. Faktor determinan yang berpengaruh terhadap populasi yaitu faktor umur dengan kisaran 25-44 tahun (62%), pasien dengan status pendidikan tingkat SMA (16%), kemudian pasien dengan status pekerjaan sebagai pekerja swasta dan pasien berstatus telah menikah (88%).
Kata kunci : Faktor Determinan,Vaginosis Bakterial, Retrospektif
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Attribution:
Jurnal Biosaintropis (Bioscience-Tropici s licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY). The work has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or part of a published lecture or thesis) and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. When the manuscript is accepted for publication in this journal, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
Permissions:
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere and by other authors are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from one of the authors.
Ethical matters:
Experiments with animals or involving human patients must have had prior approval from the appropriate ethics committee. A statement to this effect should be provided within the text at the appropriate place. Experiments involving plants or microorganisms taken from countries other than the authors™ own must have had the correct authorization for this exportation.
References
[2] Menard JP. 2011. Antibacterial treatment of bacterial vaginosis: current and emerging therapies. Int J Wom Health; 3:295-305.
[3] Atashili J, Poole C, Ndumbe PM, Adimora AA, Smith JS. 2008. Bacterial vaginosis and HIV acquisition: A meta-analysis of published studies. AIDS. 22: 149 3-1501.
[4] Mascarenhas R, Machado C, Silva B, Pimentel W, Feffeira T, Leoni S, et al.2012.Prevalence for bacterial vaginosis in a population of sexually active adolescent. J Inf Dis obst Gynec.: 1155-61
[5] Niode, N. J. 2016. “Profil vaginosis bakterial di Poliklinik Kulit dan Kelamin RSUP Prof.Dr . R D . Kandou Manado.†4.
[6] Octaviany D.2010. Risk Factors for Bacterial Vaginosis among Indonesia Women Med J Indones;19:130-5.
[7] Pudjiastuti TA, Murtiastutik D.2014. Studi retrospektif: Vaginosis bakterial. BIKKK 26(2):127-33.
[8] Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Garland SM, et al. 2005. Higher-risk behavioral practices associated with bacterial vaginosis compared with vaginal candidiasis. Obstet Gynecol 106(1):105-14.
[9] Sulistyaningsih. (2011). Metodologi penelitian kebidanan kuantitatif-kualitatif. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.
[10] Evans Al, Scally AJ, Wellard SJ, Wilson JD.2007. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in lesbians and heterosexual women in a community setting. Sex TransmInfect.;83:470-5.
[11] Sharon H, Jeanne M, Holmes KK. 2008. Bacterial vaginosis. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WE, Piot P, Wasserheit JN,Corey L, et al., editors. Sexually transmitted disease. 4th edMcGraw Hill. New York. p.737-68.
[12] Koumans EH, Stenberg M, Bruce C, McQuillan G, Kendrick J. 2007. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001-2004: Associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health. Sex Transm Dis 34:864–9
[14]Turovskiy Y, Noll KS, Chikindas M L.2011. The aetiology of bacterial vaginosis. Journal of Applied Microbiology 110 : 1105-28
[15] Indriatmi W. 2015. Vaginosis bacterial. Dalam: Menaldi SLSW, Bramono K, Indriatmi W, editors. Ilmu penyakit kulit dan kelamin.Edisi 7. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Kedokeran Univesitas Indonesia. Jakarta. hal. 452-4.
[16] Kenyon, Boulvain and Neilson. 2007. Foetomaternal Outcome in Patiens With and Without Premature Rupture of Membranes
[17] Gutman RE, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Blume J. 2005. Evaluation ofclinical methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 105(3): 551-5
[18] Ningrat FS. 2011. Uji Sensitivitas dan Spesitifitas Autobio VB Assay dan kriteria Amsel Dibandingkan dengan Skor Nugent pada Vaginosis Bakterial Bag/SMF Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin Universitas Diponegoro Semarang v. PPDS1 (19)
[19] Karim, A dan Barakbah, Y. 2014. Studi Retrospektif: Vaginosis Bakterial (Retrospektive Study: Bacterial Vaginosis). 5
[20] CDC.2015. 2017. Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Guidelines: Oral Cephalosporins No Longer a Recommended Treatment for Gonococcal Infections. 61(31):590-4. Access Juni 11, 2017. URL:http:// www.cdc.gov